Philosophy as a Dagger
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/kis.2020.52.171.1Keywords:
Nikola Milošević, mental and metaphysical harakiri, mental pain, beauty of style, melancholyAbstract
The paper involves critical reading and reevaluation of the 1967 essay “Metaphysical Harikiri” by Nikola Milošević. Considered is Milošević’s differentiating between mental and metaphysical harikiri, as well as theoretical concepts of Konstantin Leontiev, Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche and Oswald Spengler, which Milošević used to underpin his own thesis that likened philosophy to a blade or a dagger, with which the philosopher wounds himself. Even though Milošević never republished it in his later publications, the essay is an important part of his opus, especially in terms of his interpretation of the so-called bitter beauty of style found in some philosophical works characterized by a pessimistic or melancholy undercurrent.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published articles online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website, social networks like ResearchGate or Academia), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


